Continuity Across Borders: When email fails, verify the fallback before you need it

A fallback channel is useful only when it is permitted for the particular matter, reaches the right destination, and produces evidence that the communication was received. A phone number in an old email signature, a social-media account, or a postal address found through a quick search is not automatically an authorised substitute.

Start with the document that governs the contact

For a contract notice, what does the actual agreement say about the required recipient, address, channel, timing and evidence of receipt? Does it expressly permit an alternative route if email is unavailable, and who is authorised to select it? Do not assume that a phone call, messaging platform, courier or post is valid for every notice.

For a client instruction or mandate, which contact route has the client approved for this matter? Is the named contact current, and can the destination be checked against a trusted record already held by the firm? An unexpected message that supplies a new address should not, by itself, establish that the address is genuine.

Check whether a specific portal or filing route applies

If a submission is due, identify its exact type and the authority or platform named in the governing instruction. Which route is available for that submission, what destination and deadline apply, and what acknowledgement or receipt should be retained? A route that works for one filing or organisation may not apply to another.

Companies House guidance describes routes for filing company accounts and notes that requirements differ by accounts type. The practical check is which route applies to the company's particular accounts and what evidence confirms receipt—not an assumption that another method is automatically an acceptable substitute or that disruption changes a deadline.

Verify an alternative independently

Use a current, trusted record or the governing document to confirm the destination before using an alternate channel. Record who authorised the choice, when the attempt was made, the route used, and any acknowledgement or delivery evidence. Keep the record with the relevant matter so the next person can see what happened and what remains outstanding.

If the alternate route also fails, who owns escalation, what instruction governs the next attempt, and when must that person act? Preserve the distinction between an attempted contact and confirmed receipt. If legal effect or a deadline matters, seek advice on the actual document and circumstances from a qualified professional.

Check service status without assuming another service works

Microsoft's published guidance says administrators can check tenant service health in the Microsoft 365 admin center; if they cannot sign in, Microsoft's public service-status page is a fallback for known issues preventing tenant login. That is a way to check status, not a promise that another Microsoft service or contact channel is available. The public status page returned a JavaScript shell without readable incident details in Atlas's 13 November check, so the current incident and restoration status are unknown.

Sources: Microsoft Learn service health guidance; Microsoft public service status; Companies House accounts filing guidance. Read or checked 13 November 2026. The public status page returned no readable incident details.

This article is general information, not legal, tax or other professional advice; seek advice from a qualified professional in the relevant jurisdiction before acting

Join the Adam Global Roundtable on “Cross-border opportunities” on Thursday 19 November 2026, 12:30 UK time, online via Microsoft Teams. View the event and request a place.